Site Loader
Rock Street, San Francisco

Enterprise
Resource Planning System Complementarities

Typically, in order to support a successful
Enterprise Resource Planning system, it is advised that other communications
and systems should be eliminated. Enterprise Resource Planning systems are
supports for planned and routine management, this leads to the view that
Enterprise Resource Planning systems are not compatible with less structured
and spontaneous based systems (WANG and GREASLEY, n.d). However, McAfee (2008)
introduced Enterprise 2.0 as a way to introduce the social interactions within
organisations. McAfee (2009) pitched Enterprise 2.0 as the aim to build “internet
based software platforms” (WANG and GREASLEY, n.d) in order to facilitate less
structured, more spontaneous knowledge-based works within the organisation.
Technically, Enterprise 2.0 was developed from web 2.0 in order to enhance
communication. Beyond the technology Enterprise 2.0 benefits organisations by
establishing a network orientated structure and a collaborative, trustful and
transparent culture (WANG and GREASLEY. n.d). The combination of an Enterprise
Resource Planning system and Enterprise 2.0 enables a high level of
collaboration within the organisation. Enterprise Resource Planning systems
improve the collaborative activities between departments. The key tenants and
customer information sharing is limited between the groups. However, the
organisation is horizontally linked by the integrated Enterprise Resource
Planning system and Enterprise 2.0 (WANG and GREASLEY. n.d). As discussed above
Enterprise Resource Planning systems are thought to be more successful when
implemented into isolation and in my opinion, this is how organisations should
implement their chosen Enterprise Resource Planning systems, in order to help
to ensure a safer and more successful implementation. However, some software
can be adapted, for example McAfee (2008), in order to support and work
alongside the Enterprise Resource Planning systems and if an organisation
wanted to integrate its new Enterprise Resource Planning system with another
piece of software, it should not cause any harm to their Enterprise Resource Planning
system as long as the software has been adapted accordingly.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

Post Author: admin

What is a family? This question has been raised by many sociologist, with the majority of these having a range of opinions. The answer to this question is, In 1949 George Peter Murdock defined the family as ”A social group of characterized by common residence, economic co-operation, and reproduction”. He added that, ”The family includes adults of both sexes, at list two of whom maintain a socially approved sexual relationship, and one or more children”. (David Lee, 2012)father working outside the home, (2000). But these trends are far less marked in the Pakistani and Bangladeshi communities than anywhere. ” A clear majority of South Asian women report that their primary activity to be looking after the house and family”, claims Prof Berthoud, (2000).The combination of large families and non-working wives means that half South Asian households have a standard of living below the national average, even if the father is working. On the other hand, Caribbean lone parents are far more likely to work that their white counterparts, who more than half still depend on income support. Prof Berthoud writes, ” It is difficult to avoid the conclusion that it is the number of lone parents in the Caribbean community, rather than high levels of unemployment, which confines more than a third of all families with children to the safe net”. www.iser.essex.ac.ukIn conclusion, it is apparent that a move away from the traditional nuclear family may in fact benefit both society and the individual. Liberal Feminists may argue that a more neo-conventional nuclear family may be the best answer to improving family diversity whilst also retaining traditional values. A neo-conventional nuclear family is one that has altered its family structures in order to fit into society, much like Parsons idea of functional fit. This then allows women to have more freedom and perhaps fulfil the instrumental role while men fulfil the expressive roles which prevents male patriarchy within the families.

Post Author: admin

x

Hi!
I'm Eunice!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out